Fixed scope integration sprint

AI agents that work inside the systems you already have

Your people spend every day copying data between systems, answering the same questions, and assembling reports by hand, because the ERP and CRM will not do it themselves. An AI agent can take that work over inside the systems you already have, without replacing them and without a big modernisation project.

Trusted by 40+ businesses

What an agent can take over in your company

A few examples of work your people do by hand today that an agent connected to your systems does on its own.

Answering questions about company data

"How many of client X's orders are waiting for an invoice?" Instead of an email to accounting and an answer two days later, the agent checks the ERP and replies immediately, in chat or by email.

Moving data between systems

An order from an email lands in the ERP, customer details from a form land in the CRM, an invoice lands in the accounting system. No manual retyping, and none of the errors that come with it.

Handling routine requests

Order status, product availability, a copy of a document, a change of details. The agent handles the typical cases end to end, and only the exceptions reach your people.

Preparing documents and reports

Quotes, summaries, and reports built from the data already in your systems, instead of being assembled by hand from several exports.

Watching over processes

The agent keeps an eye on the data and speaks up when something needs attention: an overdue payment, stock running low, an order that got stuck.

The model is the easy part. The integration is the project.

Every LLM demo looks great until it has to read from your CRM, write to your ERP, respect your permission model, and leave a trail an auditor accepts. Closing that gap between demo and deployment is what we do. The agent gets no direct access to your databases or systems. It works only through controlled connections we build, the rules of what it may change are enforced in code, and every interaction is logged, so you always know what the AI did and why. We work the same way we do on the agent systems we run in production, within a sprint whose scope is agreed upfront.

The package

One sprint that ends with a working agent in your systems.

The scope and the quote are fixed on a scoping call, driven mainly by how many systems the agent touches and how complicated their interfaces are.

Agent Integration Sprint

from 6 weeks
  • An agent or LLM feature integrated with one or two of your systems
  • Guardrail and permission model enforced in code
  • Full interaction logging with cost and latency tracking
  • Evaluation harness with results on your real cases
  • Source code, documentation, and handover to your team
How we work

Four principles for agents in production

  1. 01
    Least privilege

    The agent only gets the permissions it needs.

    Read access is granted separately for each source, and write access separately for each action. Irreversible operations require human approval until test results show it is safe to remove it.

  2. 02
    Stable connections

    Legacy systems connect without being rebuilt.

    We build thin, well-tested adapters around your existing systems instead of asking you to modernise first. Modernisation can come later, as a separate business decision.

  3. 03
    Measure, then trust

    Autonomy is earned with evaluation data.

    Every capability starts supervised. We expand what the agent handles alone only when accuracy on your real cases clears the agreed bar.

  4. 04
    Own your stack

    You keep the code and the choices.

    Full IP transfer, provider-agnostic design, and documentation your engineers can extend without us.

An example we know well: sales knowledge locked inside two people.

Picture a company that buys sales data, for example from Nielsen: tens of thousands of rows in Excel, dozens of columns, custom category codes, and quirks you simply have to know about. Two people on the analytics team understand them. Every question from marketing or sales, even "how is our new brand doing in discount stores?", joins the queue for those two people, and the answer comes back a week later as a slide deck. In a project like this we build an assistant that knows this data. We move it from Excel into a proper database, describe the structure, the relationships, and the quirks once, in a form the AI understands, and the teams get a chat that answers questions straight from the data: with a number, a table, or a chart. Every answer shows what it was calculated from, so it can be checked. The analytics team stops being the bottleneck for simple questions and gets back to the analyses that genuinely need a human. And the knowledge of how to read this data stops living in two heads.

Example scenario

Getting an answer from sales data: before and after.

A composite of engagements we know from practice, with illustrative figures. Your numbers are set when we agree the scope.

Today

Today: a question for the analytics team

  1. 01Marketing emails the question to the analytics team5 min
  2. 02The question waits in the queue behind other requests2-4 days
  3. 03The analyst asks what exactly was meant30 min
  4. 04Manual filtering and recalculating in Excel2-3 h
  5. 05Preparing slides with the results1-2 h
  6. 06Corrections, because the question was understood differently1 day
Cycle time3 to 5 days
Throughput per persona few analyses a week
Error rateknowledge in two heads
With AI automation

After: a question for the assistant

  1. 01The question is asked in chat, in plain language1 min
  2. 02The assistant translates it into a query over the data5 s
  3. 03An answer with numbers and a chart, with the calculation source30 s
  4. 04Unusual questions go to an analystas neededto the analyst
  5. 05The analytics team does analysis, not exportsday to day
Cycle timeunder a minute
Throughput per personno limit on questions
Error rateevery result with its source

Before you ask

Anything with an interface, and many things without one: REST and SOAP APIs, SQL databases, message queues, email, file drops, and legacy ERPs whose documentation retired with its author. Integration difficulty moves the price, not the feasibility.
No. We deploy with self-hosted open models on your infrastructure when required, or EU-region cloud with your data agreements when allowed. The architecture is the same either way.
Agents act only through typed tools with validated parameters, so the worst a hallucination can produce is a rejected call, which we log and measure. Critical actions additionally require human confirmation until evaluation data justifies removing it.
You get cost-per-interaction numbers from the evaluation phase and hard budget caps in the runtime. Typical assistants run from tens to a few hundred euros per month in model costs; heavy document workloads more. You see the real number before you scale.
Six weeks is enough for an agent connected to one or two systems with cooperative interfaces. When a system needs a custom adapter or security review cycles are long, we extend the timeline honestly at the scoping stage.

Let's Talk About Your Project

Get In Touch
Maciej Roman|CEO & Co-founder

Not sure where to start? Begin with the AI Readiness Audit